Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0529 14
Original file (NR0529 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100"
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

DIC
Docket No. NR529-14
415 Jul 14

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval

‘record pursuant to the provis

A three-member panel of the B
sitting in executive session,
14 July 2014.

ions of 10 usc 1552.

oard for Correction of Naval Records,
considered your application on

your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed

sn accordance with administrative regulations and procedures

applicable to the proceedings
considered by the Board consi

Documentary material
sted of your application, together with

all material submitted in support therecf, your naval record and

regulati

ons and policies. In addition, the Board
on furnished by HoMc memo 7200 RFF-11

dated 9 May 2014, 4 copy of which is attached.

after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,

the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments

contained in the advisory opinion.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be

been denied.
furnished upon request.

accordingly, your application has

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that

favorable action cannot be taken.

reconsider its decision upon

You are entitled to have the Board
supmission of new and material evidence
In this

regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of

regularity attaches to all official records.

applying for 4 correction of

Consequently. when
an official naval record, the burden is

on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material

error OT injustice.

Sincerely,

ROBERT PD. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Enclosure: HOMC memo 7200 RFF-11 dtd 9 May 14

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8674 13

    Original file (NR8674 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2014. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 7200 RFF-11 dated 7 August 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4734 13

    Original file (NR4734 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6707 14

    Original file (NR6707 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6114 14

    Original file (NR6114 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary materia considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR6114-14 a correction of an official naval he applicant to demonstrate the existence of Consequently, when applying for record, the burden is on t probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00028-09

    Original file (00028-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 Jume 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05689 11

    Original file (05689 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 5000 RFF-DOSS02 dated 21 Jun 12 and HOMC Memo 1650 MMMA-3 dated 13 Oct 11, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12262 14

    Original file (NR12262 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S$. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board ‘requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement of travel expenses. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12229 14

    Original file (NR12229 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement of travel expenses. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6908 14

    Original file (NR6908 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show restoration of accrual leave. NR6908-14 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner executed a Special Leave Accrual request for restoration of 25 days leave.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12169 14

    Original file (NR12169 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement of travel expenses. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on February 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations,...